Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation

This paper demonstrates that some conventional indicators used in research evaluation may fail to account for the non-linearity between size of institution and performance. This can result in an overor under-estimation of the research performance of both large and small institutions and nations. This paper shows that a power law relationship exists between recognition or impact and (a) publishing size of scientific communities within an OECD science system and (b) publishing size of a research community across OECD science systems or institutions in a science system. Also, a power law relationship exists between the amount of various types of collaboration and the publishing size of institutions. A new class of scale-independent indicators is developed to overcome the inequity produced by some nonlinear characteristics commonly measured when evaluating research performance.